Data Visualization
Non-Tariff Measures and Production Allocation Decisions of Cereal Farmers
One reproducible pipeline from customs to farm-gate—so subsidy debates share the same numbers.
Making Complex Evidence Clear. Visual reporting and decision tools that translate research on trade, gender, and information systems into usable insight for partners.
Subsidy debates were gridlocked by incompatible spreadsheets. We built a single source of truth with explicit lineage from customs declarations to farm-gate price monitors.
Cereal farmers in Ghana face increasing regulation through NTMs, which influence production choices and market participation. NTMs such as quality standards and certification requirements can alter incentives, pushing farmers toward or away from certain crops. Understanding how NTMs shape production allocation decisions is critical for agricultural policy and farmer welfare. The broader challenge is that NTMs can create both opportunities and constraints. Farmers who comply may access premium markets, while those unable to meet standards may be excluded. This dynamic reshapes production systems and household livelihoods. This study situates NTMs within the broader discourse on agricultural regulation and farmer decision-making.
NTMs are a powerful driver of production decisions, shaping both risks and opportunities for cereal farmers.
Onumah, J., Martey, E., & Brümmer, B
2023
Background
Advancing through the data
Cereal farmers in Ghana face increasing regulation through NTMs, which influence production choices and market participation. NTMs such as quality standards and certification requirements can alter incentives, pushing farmers toward or away from certain crops. Understanding how NTMs shape production allocation decisions is critical for agricultural policy and farmer welfare. The broader challenge is that NTMs can create both opportunities and constraints. Farmers who comply may access premium markets, while those unable to meet standards may be excluded. This dynamic reshapes production systems and household livelihoods. This study situates NTMs within the broader discourse on agricultural regulation and farmer decision-making.
Research Approach
Farmer survey data was collected to capture production allocation decisions under NTMs. Econometric models were applied to measure the impact of NTMs on crop choice, input use, and market participation. Comparative analysis was conducted between farmers exposed to NTMs and those less affected. Qualitative interviews provided insights into farmer perceptions of NTMs and their influence on decision-making. This dual approach ensured findings were both statistically rigorous and contextually grounded.
Key findings from this study include:
- NTMs influenced crop choice and input use.
- Farmers complying with NTMs accessed premium markets.
- Non-compliant farmers faced exclusion and reduced income.
- NTMs reshaped production allocation decisions across regions.
Implications
A strategic lens for organizations and policymakers
Policymakers should design NTMs that support farmer inclusion.
Organizations can advocate for farmer-friendly regulations.
Businesses can leverage NTMs to build premium supply chains.
For organizations, this research informs farmer support programs. For policymakers, it highlights the need for inclusive regulation. For businesses, it shows how NTMs can create premium market opportunities.
NTMs are a powerful driver of production decisions, shaping both risks and opportunities for cereal farmers.
Onumah, J., Martey, E., & Brümmer, B, 2023
